OSGATA Responds to Flawed NPR Article on GMOs





Today NPR released an article, The Top Five Myths of Genetically Modified Seeds, Busted, by Dan Charles. OSGATA felt compelled to respond in order to set the record straight. Mr. Charles did not reach out to our organization, which is the lead plaintiff in OSGATA et al. v. Monsanto lawsuit,  or any of our lawyers at the Public Patent Foundation for comment. The following rebuttal has been prepared by OSGATA President Jim Gerritsen.


On Myth 2, Mr. Charles completely adopts Monsanto’s argument on these points and ignores the evidence submitted by the plaintiffs in the OSGATA et al. v. Monsanto lawsuit, like me, that Monsanto has repeatedly accused those contaminated with its seed of patent infringement, including Troy Roush (as documented by the Associated Press) and Dawn and David Runyon (as documented by CBS). Monsanto has not denied these cases, and instead points to other cases where farmers were not contaminated. But just because Monsanto sometimes sues farmers who intentionally used their seed DOES NOT mean they’ve NEVER accused farmers who did not intentionally possess their seed.

Further, what’s the word “trace” mean when Monsanto says “We won’t sue farmers for possessing TRACE amounts of our seed.” Contamination is often unnoticeable unless/until someone tests their seed supply or is contaminated by RoundUp and then notices some of their field doesn’t suffer. Thus, contamination can be in much more than “trace” amounts. Lastly, we asked Monsanto to simply put in writing that they’d never sue us before we moved forward with the case.  Our correspondence is available at the end of our Amended Complaint.

Instead of simply confirming they’d never sue us, since we want nothing to do with their GE seed, Monsanto instead hired a team of lawyers and accused us, the plaintiffs, of trying to pull a publicity stunt and being liars. I’d much rather be tending to the work on my seed farm than being involved in a lawsuit against one of the biggest, most aggressive companies in the world, but I have to protect myself and this case, where we’re only seeking the peace of mind that Monsanto could never sue us for patent infringement (and not a single dime), is the only way to do so.

If Mr. Charles really thinks its a “myth” that Monsanto would ever sue me or my co-plaintiffs or other organic, biodynamic and plainly non-GMO farmers for patent infringement, I’d gladly take an insurance policy from him offering to defend me from any potential accusations in the future. If he’s not willing to give me that insurance policy, then he’s not willing to put his money where his mouth is, which is exactly what I’m being forced to do today, put my money and my business and my family’s future on the line hoping and praying Monsanto never sues me for patent infringement when I get contaminated by their seed, something they do not even dispute will happen due to the prevalence of their seed in the marketplace.


Jim Gerritsen, President

Organic Seed Growers and Trade Association




  1. I read the judges ruling. I fail to see how you expect the court to decide in you favor.

    I suggest you re-file under a public nuisance argument. Monsanto claims that organic farmers need to create buffer zones to avoid contamination. It should be GMO farmers the ones to contain the patented seeds. Find farmers who operate close to GMO operations.

    I wish you well, but I see no standing in your complaint.

  2. Another point to make is that the pesticides being used and deeolepvd at this time are systemic , they are meant to be absorbed into the plant. So not only do we eat pesticides such as Bt Toxin, we are eating a second pesticide such as clothiandin that is being sprayed on the GMO plants. The EPA approves the pesticides, however does no testing of its own. They are not allowed to recommend labeling cautions. The FDA also does not test on its own. Plenty of studies show the endocrine disorders etc. We deserve to make our own decisions because afterall, it is a free market, eh? Well, truth be told, it’s only a free market for the big corporations, not for us because we’re kept in the dark.

Leave a Reply


P.O. Box 1502
Biddeford, ME 04005
Phone: 207-429-9765


OSGATA needs your support! Please help us in our work of protecting and developing the organic seed trade! Click here to find out more:

Donate to OSGATA

Membership Benefits

-Cross promotion of member products and services

-Political action updates and lobbying services, on state and federal level

-Access to members only listserv for networking and sharing seed industry information

-OSGATA’s regular Seed for Thought newsletter

Become a Member